Case studies · Personal · Nashik, Maharashtra · suit-filed flag

Home · Case studies · Suit Filed removed in eight days

A Suit Filed flag he had already paid off — removed in eight days: 662 → 710

By Rudolph Mathias · Credit Analyst · onboarded by Rabia Basri  ·  10 – 17 August 2026
4.9★ · 500+ Google reviewsMoney-back promiseReport evidence on page
Rudolph Mathias, Credit Analyst at Kenstone Credit
Rudolph Mathias
Credit Analyst, Kenstone Credit
Ran the disputes and escalation
~8 days
The fastest resolution in this library

Background

Mr. Santosh Chavan of Nashik, Maharashtra, came to us with a new loan application stalled by two lines on his report. The first was the harshest flag the consumer report carries: his AAVASFIN housing loan showed "Suit Filed" — even though the dues behind it had been cleared back in April 2025, more than a year earlier, and his payment grid ran clean month after month. The second: a SHRIRAMFIN business loan, paid off with the NOC in hand, still reflecting a balance and an overdue. Rabia Basri took the onboarding, set the expectation honestly — discrepancies with evidence behind them are correctable — and the file landed on my desk on 10 August 2026.

Eight days, two tracks

Both tracks started the same day. For the housing loan, a correction demand went to the lender with the clearance evidence, and a bureau dispute was raised in parallel for the record. AAVASFIN replied within two days — with a wrinkle worth documenting: the email ID on their file was outdated, so nothing sent to it would ever have reached the client. We had the current ID registered immediately and the rectification continued without losing a day. For the business loan, the correction request went to SHRIRAMFIN with the NOC attached — and when two days passed without movement, the matter was escalated through the PMO grievance mechanism rather than waiting politely in a queue.

The outcome

The report refreshed on 17 August 2026 — roughly eight days after the case was taken up — with both lines corrected: the Suit Filed flag removed from the housing loan, and the business loan reporting closed at zero balance, zero overdue. His score moved from 662 to 710, and the loan application that had been stalled had nothing left standing in its way. It is the fastest resolution in this library — and the honest reason it was fast is that the evidence was complete before we started: dues genuinely cleared, NOC genuinely in hand. Speed follows proof.

Report evidenceView his reports — before and after+
Report pulls7 Aug → 17 Aug 2026 Housing loan (AAVASFIN)Suit filed → flag removed Business loan (SHRIRAMFIN)Dues showing → Closed · ₹0 RedactedAccount nos., amounts & identifiers

Tap to compare the two reports

Before · pulled 7 Aug 2026Score 662
CIBIL report header from 7 August 2026 showing a score of 662Open full size ↗
After · pulled 17 Aug 2026Score 710
CIBIL report header from 17 August 2026 showing the score improved to 710Open full size ↗

The AAVASFIN housing loan — the Suit-Filed field, 7 August versus 17 August

BeforeSuit - Filed: Suit filed
AAVASFIN housing loan on the 7 August report with the Suit Filed Wilful Default field reading Suit filedOpen full size ↗
AfterSuit - Filed: — (removed)
The same AAVASFIN housing loan on the 17 August report with the Suit Filed field now blankOpen full size ↗

The SHRIRAMFIN business loan — dues showing after the NOC, then closed at zero

BeforeBalance & overdue showing
SHRIRAMFIN business loan on the 7 August report still showing a balance and an overdue amountOpen full size ↗
AfterClosed 01 Aug · ₹0 · ₹0
The SHRIRAMFIN business loan on the 17 August report closed with zero balance and zero overdueOpen full size ↗

Raw extracts from Mr. Santosh's own TransUnion CIBIL reports, labelled by pull dates — ten days apart. Account numbers, amounts and identifiers are redacted; the lenders are named in this article. Published with his consent.

His testimonial, in his words

Recorded by Mr. Santosh — 33 seconds, captions available. His transcript, verbatim:

Hello. I am Santosh Chavan from Nashik, Maharashtra. I had a problem in CIBIL, so Rabia Ma'am and Rudolph Sir, they helped me a lot. My — it was a negative flag of the suit file. They removed this suit, this flag, within eight days. Now I will not have any problem with the loan in the bank. Thank you, both of them.
★★★★★  "Rabia Madam and Rudolph Sir helped me remove the negative "Suit Filed" status from my credit bureau report within just 8 days. I truly appreciate their quick support, guidance, and continuous efforts in resolving the issue successfully."
His public Google review, verbatim · view screenshot ↗

Why this case matters

Because "Suit Filed" is the flag borrowers fear most — and this case documents the version nobody explains: the flag can outlive the debt. Dues cleared in April 2025 were still wearing a litigation label sixteen months later, failing loan checks a paid-up borrower should have passed. The removal took neither a lawyer nor a year: evidence of clearance, a correction demand to the lender, a parallel bureau dispute, and escalation the moment the queue stalled. It also documents a quiet failure mode worth checking on your own file — a lender holding a dead email address, so their "we informed the customer" never reached anyone. If a suit-filed or wilful-default remark is on your report, this is the exact service lane for it, and here is why the NOC you were handed is only half the job until the bureaus say the same thing.

WhatsApp us Call us